Hi Martin, thanks for your great pre-analysis. I agree to the general issue and the changes are small enough to review although the context it implies is a lot.
Also we need to be clear that this has two stages of not-correct: 2.76: 4ace25c5d6: Treat REFUSED (not SERVFAIL) as an unsuccessful upstream response 2.77: 68f6312d4b: Stop treating SERVFAIL as a successful response from upstream servers. So: - Xenial is lacking both - Zesty is lacking the second - Artful is good Since I rarely patch dsnsmasq I wanted to ask for a check before going to an SRU with that. I provided a ppa at [1] with test builds for Xenial and Zesty. If you could try those out that would be very kind. [1]: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3003 ** Also affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Zesty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726017 Title: dnsmasq prematurely returns REFUSED, breaking resolver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1726017/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
