Could you explain how it will not work for you? I suspect customers are depending on the cxlflash binary package name to get the required tools and libraries, correct? If that's the case, everything should work as with the new package naming layout installing cxlflash will also automatically install libcflsh0, pulling in all the shared libraries as previously. So generally any users and their applications depending on the .so files should not see any difference, without requiring any manual intervention.
Or maybe do you mean the addition of the libcflsh-dev package for developers? I have prepared a proof-of-concept upload into this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~sil2100/+archive/ubuntu/cxlflash Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716924 Title: [needs-packaging] [Ubuntu 18.04 FEAT] Include cxlflash package in Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1716924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
