(In reply to Kip from comment #121) > (In reply to Yuri R. Sucupira from comment #120) > > And > > unfortunately I didn't succeed in uploading data to the PPA (I'm using dput, > > but something's going wrong). I thought I could push the DEB files to the > > PPA, but it's actually forbidden: one must push the sources, which I'm > > failing to do, maybe because I'm failing to find out how to sign the > > source-code and how to authenticate into the PPA in order to push the files > > into it. I'll try again later, but I'm under the impression that I won't > > succeed. > > Hey Yuri, > > Yes, working with a PPA (sbuild) can be a real pain. I've learned over the > years how to do it. All of the things you raised are definitely annoying, > but there's actually very good reasons for all of them that make packages > better. This is the reason why Debian has such a very high quality selection > of packages because of their high standards. I really recommend checking out > the Debian Policy Manual at some point for future benefit too.
After a LOT of pain (it took me some hours) I finally managed to sign my sources and upload'em to a PPA. Here's the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~yuri- sucupira/+archive/ubuntu/thunar1.6.10-patched However, I noticed that APT is considering "1.6.10-2ubuntu1" as a newer version than my "1.6.10-2ubuntu1~patch1" version. Does anyone know how I shall version my packages, in order to make APT choose them instead of those in version 1.6.10-2ubuntu1? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512120 Title: [SRU] thunar crashes on file renaming To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1512120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
