Thank you for working on this. I was curious to understand why proposed migration didn't block this change from hitting the release pocket. Is there a missing dependency somewhere? For example:
> The current version of pcs in disco is 0.10.x, which requires pacemaker >= 2.0 and corosync >=3.0, neither of which are available yet. If this statement is true, then why isn't there a dependency declaring this, which would (I'm assuming) have prevented this situation from arising? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1826045 Title: Unsatisfiable recommended dependencies pacemaker >= 2.0, corosync >= 3.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcs/+bug/1826045/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
