Hi,

Steve Langasek wrote:
> Reading https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2019/07/msg00007.html was very
> helpful in clarifyingthe options needed to get the image structure we
> are looking for.

At least the ISO would comply to the specs, although this is in no way
mandatory for boot success. :))

> this does not address the /EFI/BOOT consideration at this point

Akeo has a valid point with demanding support for the method of unpacking
the ISO content to a FAT filesystem. Not only is it less dangerous than
our flat image copy onto the whole USB stick, but it is also something
that MS-Windows users are used to.

The price for having a copy of the EFI partition tree in the ISO should
be bearable.

On the other hand, this won't work with legacy BIOS (at least not without
tricky post-processing of ISOLINUX) and it invites problems with filenames.

This brings me to a question about .deb file names.
I see in
  https://packages.debian.org/sid/allpackages?format=txt.gz
that many packages have version texts with ":". Like
  a2ps (1:4.14-5 [alpha, amd64, ...
But the .deb file of a2ps does not show the "1:" part:
  http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/a2ps/a2ps_4.14-5_amd64.deb

Being a mere sponsored uplader, i fail to find the description how the
version gets transmogrified before becomming part of the .deb file name.
If it is clear that no ":" can sneak in via version, this risk about FAT
filenames would be much reduced.
(There remains the risk of stubborn package maintainers, though.)

I understand from Akeo's initial protest that currently the filenames in
Ubuntu ISOs are not an obstacle for the copy method which he defends.
Nevertheless, it would be re-assuring if there was a rule or algorithm
which prevents ":" from getting into .deb names.

Have a nice day :)

Thomas

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895131

Title:
  Groovy Desktop *BREAKS* the most common method of creating UEFI
  bootable drives for Ubuntu installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1895131/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to