I see. As you say, the two closed-source binaries are pretty minor, and in the case of edidparser, is no longer the recommended tool for parsing EDIDs, according to a Pi forum thread I read. There's something about the Pi 4 EDID output that it doesn't handle quite right.
Both tools only get used if there is a problem, is which case the usual port of call is the official Raspberry Pi forums, and the first thing they tell you to do is use Raspberry Pi OS anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883111 Title: [needs-packaging] raspberrypi-userland To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1883111/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
