> So that would explain it not being flagged for s390x, but not for amd64. I'm > still puzzled: I didn't find > another hint.
Ah, it's because of a migration-reference/0 run from last year: 5.3.1-1ubuntu1 migration-reference/0 None 2023-06-20 09:25:36 UTC 0h 37m 11s schopin fail @mfo, I think your query is indeed showing the raw data, but not the interpretation of the results. The analysis seems to be missing: - hints - migration-reference/0 runs I don't know if there is another db-like file that has "final" results that take all of this into account, or if it has to be analyzed each time by the excuses report when deciding if a failure should be flagged or not. But at least on the above mercurial failure, I think it's a failure that is correctly not being shown in the excuses report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2002043 Title: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.7/+bug/2002043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
