** Description changed:

  [ Impact ]
  
-  * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and justification
-    for backporting the fix to the stable release.
+ After upgrading Samba from 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.5 to
+ 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.8 (to fix LP: #2120811), the %m variable in the
+ smb.conf configuration file stopped resolving to the hostname as it
+ previously did, and now resolves to an IP address.
  
-  * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an
-    explanation of how the upload fixes this bug.
+ Note this is the second regression in the original LP: #2116098 SRU,
+ which changed samba to cope with security changes that landed in Windows
+ Server.
  
  [ Test Plan ]
  
-  * detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug
+  * detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug
  
-  * these should allow someone who is not familiar with the affected
-    package to reproduce the bug and verify that the updated package
-    fixes the problem.
+  * these should allow someone who is not familiar with the affected
+    package to reproduce the bug and verify that the updated package
+    fixes the problem.
  
-  * if other testing is appropriate to perform before landing this
-    update, this should also be described here.
+  * if other testing is appropriate to perform before landing this
+    update, this should also be described here.
  
  [ Where problems could occur ]
  
-  * Think about what the upload changes in the software. Imagine the
-    change is wrong or breaks something else: how would this show up?
+  * Think about what the upload changes in the software. Imagine the
+    change is wrong or breaks something else: how would this show up?
  
-  * It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before
-    upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important
-    to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the event
-    of a regression.
+  * It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before
+    upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important
+    to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the event
+    of a regression.
  
-  * This must never be "None" or "Low", or entirely an argument as to why
-    your upload is low risk.
+  * This must never be "None" or "Low", or entirely an argument as to why
+    your upload is low risk.
  
-  * This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered,
-    and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU.
+  * This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered,
+    and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU.
  
  [ Other Info ]
  
-  * Anything else you think is useful to include
+  * Anything else you think is useful to include
  
-  * Make sure to explain any deviation from the norm, to save the SRU
-    reviewer from having to infer your reasoning, possibly incorrectly.
-    This should also help reduce review iterations, particularly when the
-    reason for the deviation is not obvious.
+  * Make sure to explain any deviation from the norm, to save the SRU
+    reviewer from having to infer your reasoning, possibly incorrectly.
+    This should also help reduce review iterations, particularly when the
+    reason for the deviation is not obvious.
  
-  * Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams
-    and the Technical Board and address these questions in advance
- 
+  * Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams
+    and the Technical Board and address these questions in advance
  
  [ Original Description ]
  
  Description:
  
  After upgrading Samba from 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.5 to
  2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.8, the %m variable in the smb.conf configuration
  file stopped resolving to the hostname as it previously did. This issue
  affects configurations that rely on %m for host-based home directory
  mapping.
  
  Use Case:
  
  My Samba server is configured to serve user home directories based on
  both hostname and username. Here is the relevant section of my
  /etc/samba/smb.conf:
  
  [homes]
    comment = Home Directories
    path = /share/samba/%m/%S
  
  This configuration had worked for years. For example, when client1
  connected as user1, the server would serve the home directory from:
  
  /share/samba/client1/user1
  
  Observed Behavior:
  
      Up to version 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.6:
      %m was correctly substituted with the client's hostname (e.g., client1).
  
      In version 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.7:
      %m was empty (""), causing Samba to try accessing /share/samba//user1, 
which failed due to a nonexistent path.
  
      In version 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.8:
      %m is now set to the client's IP address (e.g., 192.168.1.123) instead of 
the hostname, resulting in paths like:
  
      /share/samba/192.168.1.123/user1
  
  This is not the intended behavior and breaks existing configurations.
  
  Debugging:
  
  To debug the value of %m, I added the following line to the config:
  
  preexec = /bin/sh -c 'echo m=%m >> /tmp/smb.log'
  
  Results:
  
  With 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.5 (or .6):
  
  m=client1
  
  With 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.7:
  
  m=
  
  With 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.8:
  
  m=192.168.1.123
  
  Conclusion:
  
  This appears to be a regression in how Samba resolves %m. It may be
  related to [Bug 2120811], which also affected other variables like %U.
  
  For now, I’ve reverted to 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.5, where everything
  works as expected. I'm hoping for a fix or clarification in a future
  release.
  
  Best regards.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2123902

Title:
  Regression in %m Variable Substitution: IP instead of name

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/2123902/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to