Public bug reported:

There are compiler crashes on the ppc64el architecture causing FTBFS of
rocblas 6.4.4-2 and rocfft 6.4.3-1. I don't think we're going to find a
solution any time soon, so I am requesting that the ppc64el binaries be
removed. This will allow these packages to migrate from resolute-
proposed to resolute, despite not having ppc64el binaries. The old
rocblas 5.5.1+dfsg-7 and rocfft0 6.1.2-1 packages (and their reverse
dependencies) have already been removed from Debian Testing and the
existing resolute packages are broken anyway due to an incompatibility
between libamdhip64-5 and libhsa-runtime-1 6.4.3+dfsg-1 and later.

It's unfortunate that libspfft1 and libspfft-dev have been affected by
this ppc64el bug via their dependency on librocfft0. To address this, I
will propose a patch to build spfft without ROCm support on ppc64el.

The removal may also cause ectrans to FTBFS on ppc64el (although it
seems that ectrans 1.7.0-2 is currently FTBFS for unrelated reasons
anyway). A patch that drops ROCm support on ppc64el from ectrans is
pending upload on Debian.

Please remove the following binary packages from resolute:

librocblas0 5.5.1+dfsg-7 resolute ppc64el
librocblas-dev 5.5.1+dfsg-7 resolute ppc64el
librocblas0-tests 5.5.1+dfsg-7 resolute ppc64el
librocblas0-bench 5.5.1+dfsg-7 resolute ppc64el

librocsolver0 5.5.1-7 resolute ppc64el
librocsolver-dev 5.5.1-7 resolute ppc64el
librocsolver0-tests 5.5.1-7 resolute ppc64el
librocsolver0-bench 5.5.1-7 resolute ppc64el

libhipblas0 5.5.1-4build1 resolute ppc64el
libhipblas-dev 5.5.1-4build1 resolute ppc64el
libhipblas0-tests 5.5.1-4build1 resolute ppc64el

libhipsolver0 5.5.1-8 resolute ppc64el
libhipsolver-dev 5.5.1-8 resolute ppc64el
libhipsolver0-tests 5.5.1-8 resolute ppc64el

libggml-hip 0.0~git20250712.d62df60-1 resolute ppc64el

libmiopen1 5.5.1+dfsg2-3build1 resolute ppc64el
libmiopen-dev 5.5.1+dfsg2-3build1 resolute ppc64el
libmiopen1-tests 5.5.1+dfsg2-3build1  resolute ppc64el

librocfft0 6.1.2-1build3 resolute ppc64el
librocfft-dev 6.1.2-1build3 resolute ppc64el
librocfft0-tests 6.1.2-1build3 resolute ppc64el

libhipfft0 6.1.2-3build1 resolute ppc64el
libhipfft-dev 6.1.2-3build1 resolute ppc64el
libhipfft0-tests 6.1.2-3build1 resolute ppc64el

libspfft1 1.1.1-4 resolute ppc64el
libspfft-dev 1.1.1-4 resolute ppc64el

** Affects: ggml (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: hipblas (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: hipfft (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: hipsolver (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: miopen (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: rocblas (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: rocfft (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: rocsolver (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: spfft (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Also affects: rocfft (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: rocsolver (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: hipblas (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: hipsolver (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: hipfft (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: ggml (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: miopen (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: spfft (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Description changed:

  There are compiler crashes on the ppc64el architecture causing FTBFS of
  rocblas 6.4.4-2 and rocfft 6.4.3-1. I don't think we're going to find a
  solution any time soon, so I am requesting that the ppc64el binaries be
  removed. This will allow these packages to migrate from resolute-
  proposed to resolute, despite not having ppc64el binaries. The old
  rocblas 5.5.1+dfsg-7 and rocfft0 6.1.2-1 packages (and their reverse
  dependencies) have already been removed from Debian Testing and the
  existing resolute packages are broken anyway due to an incompatibility
  between libamdhip64-5 and libhsa-runtime-1 6.4.3+dfsg-1 and later.
  
  It's unfortunate that libspfft1 and libspfft-dev have been affected by
  this ppc64el bug via their dependency on librocfft0. To address this, I
  will propose a patch to build spfft without ROCm support on ppc64el.
  
  The removal may also cause ectrans to FTBFS on ppc64el (although it
  seems that ectrans 1.7.0-2 is currently FTBFS for unrelated reasons
  anyway). A patch that drops ROCm support on ppc64el from ectrans is
  pending upload on Debian.
  
  Please remove the following binary packages from resolute:
  
  librocblas0 5.5.1+dfsg-7 resolute ppc64el
  librocblas-dev 5.5.1+dfsg-7 resolute ppc64el
  librocblas0-tests 5.5.1+dfsg-7 resolute ppc64el
  librocblas0-bench 5.5.1+dfsg-7 resolute ppc64el
  
  librocsolver0 5.5.1-7 resolute ppc64el
  librocsolver-dev 5.5.1-7 resolute ppc64el
  librocsolver0-tests 5.5.1-7 resolute ppc64el
  librocsolver0-bench 5.5.1-7 resolute ppc64el
  
  libhipblas0 5.5.1-4build1 resolute ppc64el
  libhipblas-dev 5.5.1-4build1 resolute ppc64el
  libhipblas0-tests 5.5.1-4build1 resolute ppc64el
  
+ libhipsolver0 5.5.1-8 resolute ppc64el
+ libhipsolver-dev 5.5.1-8 resolute ppc64el
+ libhipsolver0-tests 5.5.1-8 resolute ppc64el
+ 
  libggml-hip 0.0~git20250712.d62df60-1 resolute ppc64el
  
  libmiopen1 5.5.1+dfsg2-3build1 resolute ppc64el
  libmiopen-dev 5.5.1+dfsg2-3build1 resolute ppc64el
  libmiopen1-tests 5.5.1+dfsg2-3build1  resolute ppc64el
  
  librocfft0 6.1.2-1build3 resolute ppc64el
  librocfft-dev 6.1.2-1build3 resolute ppc64el
  librocfft0-tests 6.1.2-1build3 resolute ppc64el
  
  libhipfft0 6.1.2-3build1 resolute ppc64el
  libhipfft-dev 6.1.2-3build1 resolute ppc64el
  libhipfft0-tests 6.1.2-3build1 resolute ppc64el
  
  libspfft1 1.1.1-4 resolute ppc64el
  libspfft-dev 1.1.1-4 resolute ppc64el

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2134241

Title:
   Please RM ppc64el binaries

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ggml/+bug/2134241/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to