Thank you very much for the comments and review Frank! I am considering forwarding patch #3 but the #1 and #2 could be not relevant for upstream since they use different compiler and way to build docs.
About the license for debian files, I followed the advice given here: https://library.canonical.com/legal-processes/licensing- policy#:~:text=places%2E-,Packaging so it is same as the software being packaged. I will be updating the description section for packages in d/control and let you know afterwards -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2141514 Title: [needs-packaging] rocwmma - in ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2141514/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
