Yes, complete removal from stonking makes sense. Thanks for the idea. ** Summary changed:
- Please demote gscan2pdf to stonking proposed + Please remove gscan2pdf from stonking ** Description changed: Please remove gscan2pdf from stonking release. Its autopkgtests fail with imagemagick in stonking-proposed. gscan2pdf was removed from Debian Testing a month ago for this issue. In this particular case, imagemagick needs to migrate so that we can complete the openexr transition which has entangled a large number of packages. Additionally, imagemagick is a security-sensitive package and the proposed update fixes many reported CVEs. - Maybe we need a block-proposed bug in order to do the demotion and have - it hold? - $ reverse-depends src:gscan2pdf No reverse dependencies found $ reverse-depends -b src:gscan2pdf No reverse dependencies found -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2156380 Title: Please remove gscan2pdf from stonking To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gscan2pdf/+bug/2156380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
