------- Comment From [email protected] 2026-08-14 11:16 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #14)
[...]
> As one can see there are only minimal improvements (close to noise, but at
> least no regressions).
> I did multiple test runs, with reboot before (cold cache), three in a row
> (hot caches), but the difference was negligible.
>
> There are less performance improvements than I assumed, especially after
> having seen Ravi's results on a different platform:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~ravi-sharma/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+git/openssl/
> +merge/509495/comments/1387077
>
> But Timo/Boris, is this a level of improvements that you expected?

Timo put some performance expectations in PR on github [1]. I would
expect numbers close to the ones in the PR. Timo returns on Monday,
maybe he can have a closer look into it.

[1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/30812

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2138632

Title:
  [26.10 FEAT] [SEC2555] openSSL: optimize ML-DSA for the s390x
  architecture

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2138632/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to