On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:08 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote: > does this mean you don't see the error when the atlas packages are not > installed?
Assume you mean [Bug 134277] ? The test script for that analysed two matrices, one of which was OK with atlas but not without, the other failed with atlas but was OK without. This is the same for the numpy version (attached). [Bug 195396] is not affected by presence/absence of atlas. > would it be possible to recheck on hardy (with or without atlas)? all > fortran libs are now built using gfortran instead of g77. > I can have a look for diagnostic purposes (probably not 'till next week though), but simply upgrading the hardy would not be at all a preferred solution (I do want the LTS). My solution to date has been to simply do the error check and fall back to Gauss-Jordan (+/- Gramm-Schmidt) if it fails. Although this isn't the most elegant solution, it does yield a tolerable performance, so maybe I should just stick with that. /best/* Mark -- Dr. Mark Poolman Senior Research Fellow Cell Systems Modelling Group School of Life Science Oxford Brookes University -- bad exit() from LinearAlgebra.singular_value_decomposition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
