On 02/09/11 20:00, Jeff Fortin wrote: >> The pitivi team just got a new version out with quite some nice >> changesin it and said they would do the glade to gtkbuilder >> conversion thiscycle, that seems enough material to revisit the >> decision later if thenew version is proving to be solid and the >> gtkbuilder switch get done sowhat people think of keeping pitivi on >> by default until before beta anddiscuss what we do in a desktop team >> meeting then? > > Hi, we're about to release a new version (hopefully this week-end) and > I was wondering if you folks had any special requirements. The last > time we talked with people from Ubuntu we learned that you are very > careful about saving space on the install CD, so to make pitivi fit we > migrated from libglade to gtkbuilder, got rid of the gconf dependency > (maybe some other things too, I forget), and I implemented a > soft-dependency manager so most remainings deps are optional. > > We haven't heard from the Ubuntu/Canonical folks at all since I asked > on this mailing list in May. I've been subscribed to this mailing list > and haven't seen further discussions on revisiting the decision to > include pitivi or not... and I couldn't get a hold of you on IRC when > I publicly asked the question a couple of times. We're completely in > the dark here. Can we have a status update with any outstanding issues > you may have? > >
Hi, Sebastien is on vacation this week and I'm not sure if he is checking e-mails. I'm not in a position to give you an authoritative answer on this, but PiTiVi was mentioned briefly in our desktop team meeting last week - see http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/08/23/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t15:54. The consensus seemed to be that we would revisit the decision at UDS. Sorry I can't give you a more definitive answer. Regards Chris
-- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
