In case anyone does not know what PS stands for (which I am sure many don't). Its Product Strategy previously called DX-team.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Didier Roche <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > as you probably know already, PS is our upstream for a lot of desktop > components nowadays (Unity, compiz, webapps, indicators, multi touch > stackā¦). > The past cycle has been a real ride in term of features, which spawn the > release team, translation team and documentation team with FFe/UIFe. We > need to discuss a way to ease the process in both ways with all involved > parts. > > Seeing the importance of those components on our stack today, I think for > instance that having a standing FF/UIF exception as we have for GNOME > components in ubuntu will make sense. However, the counter-part will be > that PS will work on getting things landing only when they are ready, to > avoid further and further refinements (and additional documentation > changes) as we had in the past just to "match the date gate". So this one > can clearly be a win-win situation. > > Also, I want to discuss about what can land in a SRU. Little (few pixel > move) change, not really impacting the documentation may want to be > considered. We currently have 2 examples we can discuss in the session: > > - https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1043808 (Dash: Preview activation > doesn't have instant feedback). Design worked on a spinner to partially > address this one. This is a behavior change in some way, for a transient > state, however it can be completely acceptable in a SRU as it will make the > quantal experience better and don't change doc/add new strings, and so on. > > - Another one is the ribbon on the application lens for software-center > content. This one is giving (due to pixelized images with the magazines) a > lot of headaches to design and they would want to remove it. This specific > case is an UI change, but doesn't seem it would impact the understanding of > the lens. > > We can base the UDS discussion on those examples to see how we can get the > process smoother and more reliable for everyone in the next cycle and going > on. :) > > Cheers, > Didier > > -- > ubuntu-desktop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop > >
-- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
