On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Robert Ancell <[email protected]> wrote: > The functionality of Sushi seems very good but the discoverability is > terrible. Has this been raised with upstream at all?
Not that I'm aware of, but how would you make something like this more discoverable except install it by default and mention it as a feature? On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Sebastien Bacher <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Jeremy for starting that discussion. Your email doesn't gives > much details about the user experience benefits and the status of the > package/cost though. How is a typical user interaction with the tool > like? Is there any known side effect/user complains about it? What file > format does it preview and using what backend? How well is it maintained > upstream and in Debian/Ubuntu? What's the cve/bug reports status? It sounds like maybe I should go ahead and open a MIR bug to answer several of those questions! (but maybe hold off on subscribing ubuntu-mir for now). I don't recall any complaints about the feature. Maybe you should just install it and see for yourself? Here's a recent brief look: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2016/09/gnome-sushi-mac-quick-look-nautilus Thanks, Jeremy -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
