Hello again, Martin Pitt [2015-08-25 6:55 +0200]: > I just enabled autopkgtests for armhf, i. e. from now on > > > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html > > will trigger, show, and block on regressions of armhf tests. > > Since the new cloud infrastructure we do the regression detection per > architecture, so a failing armhf test which never succeeded will *not* > block packages. But one which succeeded in the past will now. This > will ensure that we avoid regressions on armhf. > > These are still run on the same manually maintained hardware > (cyclops-nodeXX) as we did under Jenkins, in LXC. Proper ScalingStack > support for armhf is in the works, until then I'll keep a daily eye on > the cyclopses. > > If this causes too many problems, we can disable it again, but let's > give this a try. Please let me know if you run into inordinate > blockers! > > Thanks, > > Martin > > P.S. I'd also like to do that on ppc64el, but the containers > frequently die through the OOM killer, so they aren't suitable for > putting back into production right now.
I fixed/robustified this, so all of the above now applies to ppc64el too. gcc-5 in -proposed helpfully triggered some 350 tests which made for a nice smoke test. The queue is still at ~ 60, but stability is looking okay for now. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel-announce mailing list ubuntu-devel-announce@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce