On 9/27/07, Erik Andrén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/9/27, Waldemar Kornewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ... > > ------ > > Are there any alternatives? Here are two examples: > > > > Use SMART (AFAIK, Vista does that). > > SMART is hardware- and not filesystem dependent. > Besides, the implementation of SMART differs wildly from each hard-drive > manufacturer.
Isn't a hardware defect the main reason a file system can be corrupted without a crash? There can be serious FS bugs, but aren't those very rare, anyway? What else could lead to FS corruption? Regards, Waldemar Kornewald -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
