On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:16 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:41:22PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 02:17:47PM -0500, Ted Gould wrote: > > > But, I'd also love to see the requirements for Universe be something > > > higher than just the DFSG. For instance, I believe Debian requires > > > everything in /usr/bin to have a man page. Many of these I see as the > > > modern desktop equivalent of having a man page. > > > > eXtreme +1 > > > > And not just universe. I would love this requirement to be more strictly > > enforced in the entire Ubuntu archive. > > I don't think we should do this unless we also have the manpower > resources identified to bring apps up to meet the standards. There are > a lot of otherwise good, powerful applications which simply haven't kept > up with the latest GUI technologies, and it would be shooting ourselves > in the foot to simply drop them.
Well, I don't think we'll ever have the manpower to change all of Open
Source for any particular vision. I'd love that, but I think the
expectation is unreasonable. What we can do is provide leadership in
what makes good software, and be clear about our standards there. I
would for instance, be against any requirement that didn't have a good
guide on how to fix it and perhaps a UDW presentation on it. We
shouldn't adopt new standards quickly or randomly. But starting to set
a process in place for adopting new standards is the first step.
> If the goal here is to motivate projects to implement particular
> technologies that we want to see more consistent across applications,
> there are way more effective tactics to employ for that...
Like? :-)
> If the goal is to clear out clutter from universe and/or main that we
> have to support, I would think Debian already should have processes for
> this?
It's less about trying to "clear out" as much as "make better." I
imagine that most projects would have the examples I listed as a goal,
that they'll get to at some point. We'd just be establishing a deadline
or requirement for that. It's like the student doing their homework
midnight before it's due -- I imagine that a lot of projects would get
around to it if there was a movement in that direction.
--Ted
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
