On 07/29/2011 02:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >>> CCing ubuntu-devel so people are aware of the issue >>> Due to the accidental autosync, we pulled in a libjpeg8-dev that >>> provides libjpeg-dev. Should we revert that one change (not provide >>> libjpeg-dev in libjpeg8) or should we try to do the transition? There >>> are a number of incomplete transitions ATM (libnotify, libssl, libav, >>> boost1.4.6, and a few more with ~10 packages each). >>> Attached are a list of rdepends affected. >> ...ouch. >> Given we'll be putting out the A3 release next week, and I don't believe >> this update and transition is essential, my preference would be to >> revert it for now, and then after A3's out, assess if if makes sense >> to pull it in and manage the transition, or wait until P-series for this >> one. >> Given all the stuff about to land for A3 and Feature Freeze almost upon >> us, it seems a bit risky to add this in, esp. with folks going on >> vacation right now. >> What do others think? > I agree, best to back this out. Micah, will you upload the necessary > change? (Sooner better than later, so we don't drift too much while > libjpeg8-dev is the default?) > Actually, libjpeg8-dev isn't the default ATM. Anything with libjpeg-dev as a build depend will FTBFS since 2 packages provide the same virtual libjpeg-dev package. I'll prepare an upload to fix, but I need it sponsored still. Thanks, Micah
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
