On 07/29/2011 10:47 AM, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 07/29/2011 02:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >>>> CCing ubuntu-devel so people are aware of the issue >>>> Due to the accidental autosync, we pulled in a libjpeg8-dev that >>>> provides libjpeg-dev. Should we revert that one change (not provide >>>> libjpeg-dev in libjpeg8) or should we try to do the transition? There >>>> are a number of incomplete transitions ATM (libnotify, libssl, libav, >>>> boost1.4.6, and a few more with ~10 packages each). >>>> Attached are a list of rdepends affected. >>> ...ouch. >>> Given we'll be putting out the A3 release next week, and I don't believe >>> this update and transition is essential, my preference would be to >>> revert it for now, and then after A3's out, assess if if makes sense >>> to pull it in and manage the transition, or wait until P-series for this >>> one. >>> Given all the stuff about to land for A3 and Feature Freeze almost upon >>> us, it seems a bit risky to add this in, esp. with folks going on >>> vacation right now. >>> What do others think? >> I agree, best to back this out. Micah, will you upload the necessary >> change? (Sooner better than later, so we don't drift too much while >> libjpeg8-dev is the default?) >> > Actually, libjpeg8-dev isn't the default ATM. Anything with libjpeg-dev > as a build depend will FTBFS since 2 packages provide the same virtual > libjpeg-dev package. I'll prepare an upload to fix, but I need it > sponsored still. > Thanks, > Micah > This has been uploaded and should be available after the next publisher run. Thanks, Micah
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
