On 09/13/2011 12:44 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:32:58AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: >> Right, for those in particular the fixes should be sent to upstream >> right away, not to Debian, as it's not a problem that actually affects >> Debian (yet). > > I think Matthias said that he'd like to turn that on in Debian too quite > soon, actually.
There are concerns not to turn these on in Debian, and they are not as important for Debian as for Ubuntu. Debian has binNMUs, which we do simulate by our "buildX" uploads. The main benefit for Ubuntu now is that less packages have to be uploaded this way, less work load on powerpc and armel buildds, and we do have less dependencies, less NBS cruft at the end of the release cycle. Not much current software has the issue of objects/libraries ordering on the command line, these are most found in packages which aren't active any more, both in Debian or upstream. I don't expect many merges there. Take the ftbfs as a chance for a condolence in the mortuary. Matthias -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
