On 02/25/2012 08:41 PM, Scott Ritchie wrote: > I'm tempted to just break lmms' build and revert the change, going with > a hard dependency on wine1.4-i386, but it feels like this sort of issue > is going to come up again. There are other reasons to do this - for > example 64-bit only Wine has no real way of detecting a 32-bit > application and prompting the user to install the proper package. If a > true needs-64-bit-wine to build application creeps its way into Precise > post release, then I can always issue an SRU (which are immune to > archive skew).
Update: it seems lmms wasn't made to understand 64-bit wine anyway, and was just ignoring it during build on amd64. So this change seems relatively harmless for now, at least until we see genuine 64-bit wine dependencies. Thanks, Scott Ritchie -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
