On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:11:38PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 04/27/2012 06:00 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:46:50PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: > >> Now that we can use -proposed during development, the only arch skew > >> should be from autosyncs. > > I don't think that's a realistic assessment of how -proposed will be used in > > practice. We should not be duplicating the entirety of Debian's testing > > propagation - doing so would bring a whole set of other problems that we are > > not currently set up to handle.
> The main arch skew issues in the past regarding builds as I remember > them are glib, gtk, and openjdk which we all upload directly. Wasn't > the intent to use proposed for these updates during the devel cycle? We should use -proposed for *select* uploads to the development release. But you said "the only arch skew should be from autosyncs", which I do not expect to be true at all. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
