On 04/27/2012 06:23 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:11:38PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >> On 04/27/2012 06:00 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:46:50PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >>>> Now that we can use -proposed during development, the only arch skew >>>> should be from autosyncs. >>> I don't think that's a realistic assessment of how -proposed will be used in >>> practice. We should not be duplicating the entirety of Debian's testing >>> propagation - doing so would bring a whole set of other problems that we are >>> not currently set up to handle. >> The main arch skew issues in the past regarding builds as I remember >> them are glib, gtk, and openjdk which we all upload directly. Wasn't >> the intent to use proposed for these updates during the devel cycle? > We should use -proposed for *select* uploads to the development release. > But you said "the only arch skew should be from autosyncs", which I do not > expect to be true at all. :) Yes, of course, we're not replacing the testing migration from Debian, nor will every potential skew upload go through -proposed. However, arch skews should be less than in past releases now that we can use -proposed for potentially disruptive uploads. Micah
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
