On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:02:08PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 06:11:40PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > Do we have a list/wiki page/some other form of coordination showing the > > packages that are:
> > - known to be clean C++98 ABI > > - unknown > > - known to be broken C++0x/gcc-4.7 > > If not, who will start one and where? > It seems, none of this is needed anymore: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-07/msg00024.html > so we "only" need: > - the gcc with the revert > - a full rebuild of quantal A full rebuild of quantal is not practical (or appropriate). This needs in some way to be targeted at the packages that are using C++0x. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
