On 7 August 2012 11:22, Bjoern Michaelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 09:13:33AM +0200, Didier Roche wrote: >> I don't know where are the state of our C++ libs, but I got >> confirmation that after they got the gcc 4.7 ABI fix for c++11, they >> indeed rebuild the whole std stack, including libsigc++. > > Its the libs that I care about. Also note: > > > http://jaegerandi.blogspot.de/2012/07/gcc-47-c-abi-changes-and-opensuse-122.html > > OpenSUSE seeing the necessity to rebuild the whole stack. I dont think they > did > that just for fun. > >> Are we safe in that regard? (can I try to switch unity back to 4.7?) > > I dont think you were ever any safer by using 4.6 against other libs having > still incompatible C++11 ABI dirt in them? It only helps you against your own > code being dirty. >
For some repositories, they automatically trigger r-deps rebuilds without manual uploads. So they actually might not know binary status of the archive. In ubuntu, an explicit source upload is always required to trigger a build in the archive, hence we need less of it. Plus we don't know if opensuse enabled C++11 by default/more than we did. So it's quite different world there in the OBS. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
