Thanks for the feedback! I'll ask the TB to do this then, at their (our) next meeting.
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 03:06:21PM +0200, Simon Chopin wrote: > > I do not know the ruling/processing, would the decision to switch need > > to be an election itself? > > Or is that something that can be discussed here and then decided by > > the TB to make it official? > > The precise delegation path that led to the DMB having the powers it had > today is hard to figure out, but at least its most technically powerful > right — managing the Core Dev team — was handled by the TB before, > according to > https://ubuntu-news.org/2009/12/09/call-for-nominations-ubuntu-developer-membership-board/ Nice find! > For me, that makes a simple vote from the current TB enough to enact any > change regarding the way the DMB works. I agree. My understanding is that everything the DMB does is under the authority of the TB, and therefore the TB has the authority to change that as they feel appropriate. I prefer to seek this kind of change by consensus - which it appears we have - but for such a significant structural change a formal TB decision seems like the right way, and the members to be directly appointed can be affirmed at the same time. Robie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
