Hi Simon, On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 4:28 PM Simon Chopin <scho...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > For the sake of clarity: appointments should still have clearly defined > durations and existing members should explicitly reapply.
That's fair. And also what I had in mind especially when LP membership (currently at least) is expiry based. So something like a 2-year term a volunteer commits to. Perfectly fine (not ideal) to step down at any point in time. And should ask TB to run again when their membership is about to expire (like T-30 days or something). > A common risk in FOSS communities is one of volunteers burning out. > Having periodic checkpoints where one must explicitly assess whether > they still have the time and energy to serve is fairly healthy. Definitely. Agreed. > Case in point: I'm not running again, but I don't think I could have > ever explicitly quit. Well, you could've communicated to us regardless. ;) Anyway, thank you for serving your time in DMB. Hope you can step up again in the future. - u -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
