On Apr 12, 2011, at 09:51 AM, Martin Pool wrote: >Thanks, Barry, that's very neat. > >spiv mentioned the other day he found it a bit unclear at the moment >what was on the bzr team's path towards udd was at the moment. In a >nutshell, what we're going to do is get package-import.ubuntu.com >failures down to 0, and work on bugs that are affecting Ubuntu or >Linaro developers, including fetch speed. The specific things we >choose towards these are going to be shortlisted into ><https://bugs.launchpad.net/~canonical-bazaar/+assignedbugs>, and will >also show up in ><http://people.canonical.com/~mbp/kanban/canonical-bazaar-kanban.html>. > The next major features coming up would probably be quilt imports and >colocated branches, but I'd like to get more existing failures fixed >first. Perhaps we should draw a line for when to cut over.
This all sounds great, thanks. If you can really drive import failures to zero, then bug 609187 probably becomes less important. In the meantime, can I make a special plea for this bug? :) I think it's really important to streamline detection of out-of-date branches. We should discuss at UDS-O what needs to be done for greater adoption of UDD. I'm seeing lots of branches submitted for review every time I patch pilot, which is really great to see. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
