On 13 April 2011 01:24, Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Apr 12, 2011, at 01:29 PM, John Arbash Meinel wrote: > >>1100 UTC is excellent for me :). 2100UTC is about 11pm for me, which is >>possible, but a bit unlikely. My family is certainly usually asleep >>before 10, but lately so am I. > > If there are no objections, I'm certainly willing to give it a shot. I know > that Scott K said the time will be less convenient for him, which is > unfortunate, but I still think we should run an experiment with the new time. > If we don't like it, we can change it back. Or perhaps we'll want to > alternate to get better coverage. > > Martin, I think you own the gcal event. Can you make the change so that we're > meeting at 1100 UTC for the next meeting (20-Apr)?
OK, done, that's next Wednesday: morning in the US, lunch time in the EU, and evening in Australia. Two weeks after that, the 4th of May, I'll be travelling for so I for one can't attend, but I think you should meet without me. Then the 18th of May I'll be in London but that time still works. Martin -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
