Parthan SR wrote: > Manish Sinha (मनीष सिन्हा) wrote: > >> I know what I am recommending is not a solution but a workaround. I >> hardly see anyone using Rhythmbox music player. Still wonder why Ubuntu >> keeps it as the default. >> >> > Eh? I've been using it for the last two years now and I know a lot of > people who use it by default. >
I also know people using it, but they are still outnumbered by people who prefer other players. No offence meant, but its not at par with Banshee, or Amarok. Again its personal taste. Can you explain why people move away from it to other players? Atleast I can, since other players are far better than Rythmbox. >> Ambika, I suggest you to get a good music player for your needs. This >> may sound harsh, but this is the fact. Rythmbox is in the same state as >> Windows Media Player of Windows 98. >> >> > Can you back up your statement with a fact/proof? The last release I see > was made during July 2008. What do you mean by "in the same state of"? > > Fact/Proof? It's my personal experiences. I never found anything so great in it. Songbird and Amarok have better Album management esp the categorization of tracks. Not at am a KDE fan (dont use KDE), but still other players are far ahead. BTW I don't intend to start a flamewar here. We have enough on DE's and Toolkits and Languages. Regards, Manish -- ubuntu-in mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
