Hey guys..... take ice .....and please cooldown.. It is discussion not war . Please respect other opinon also .
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, "Manish Sinha (मनीष सिन्हा)" < [email protected]> wrote: > Parthan SR wrote: > > Manish Sinha (मनीष सिन्हा) wrote: > > > >> I know what I am recommending is not a solution but a workaround. I > >> hardly see anyone using Rhythmbox music player. Still wonder why Ubuntu > >> keeps it as the default. > >> > >> > > Eh? I've been using it for the last two years now and I know a lot of > > people who use it by default. > > > > I also know people using it, but they are still outnumbered by people > who prefer other players. > No offence meant, but its not at par with Banshee, or Amarok. Again its > personal taste. Can you explain why people move away from it to other > players? Atleast I can, since other players are far better than Rythmbox. > > >> Ambika, I suggest you to get a good music player for your needs. This > >> may sound harsh, but this is the fact. Rythmbox is in the same state as > >> Windows Media Player of Windows 98. > >> > >> > > Can you back up your statement with a fact/proof? The last release I see > > was made during July 2008. What do you mean by "in the same state of"? > > > > > > Fact/Proof? It's my personal experiences. I never found anything so > great in it. Songbird and Amarok have better Album management esp the > categorization of tracks. Not at am a KDE fan (dont use KDE), but still > other players are far ahead. > > BTW I don't intend to start a flamewar here. We have enough on DE's and > Toolkits and Languages. > > Regards, > Manish > > -- > ubuntu-in mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in > -- ambika.................... visit my website and celebrate an ancient art http://ambika.web.officelive.com/default.htm visit my blog www.kathakguru.blogspot.com http://www.careerhelpforu.blogspot.com/
-- ubuntu-in mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
