On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Narendra Sisodiya < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Sriranga(78yrsold) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Have you tried with wube.exe (installing within the WinxP as part of its >> software) It is very fast than live/installing >> which I had experienced long back at the time of installing ubuntu 9.04. >> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Narendra Sisodiya < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Raseel Bhagat >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> No speed difference. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks a lot. I was just asking this. and nothing else. >>> >> > Actually, When I made SchoolOS remix, it comes out to be 2.1GB Live DVD. > some students reported that they are unable to boot DVD. That is true > because LiveDVD need good amount of RAM (don't know exact requirement). So I > was asking more information on this. > Next version is going to be 3-4GB and we are going to choose Install only > option. No Live. so i was searching that How I can give both option. Hi, while it is generally true that a LiveDVD required more RAM than a LiveCD, I have always thought that the reason for this is that a LiveDVD will offer you many more options on boot, has a grub-screen with colors, et al. Other than this, I don't see any reason why a LiveDVD should take up more RAM. It just has more content. CMIIW -- Raseel
-- ubuntu-in mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
