Matthew Revell wrote: > Did you mean to send this to just me or to the list as a whole? :) > > On 29/06/06, Jan Vancura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We agreed on pruning launchpad as well - please see logs. > > I've read through the logs and I can't see anything that specifically > says that we should to prune Launchpad. Do you have a timing? > Obviously I've misunderstood what was agreed. > Have a mouthful :)
Jun 28 21:24:59 <coopster> jenda: i agree. any member list we have right now needs to be pruned to only the active members Jun 28 21:24:59 <matthewrevell> jenda: ...what the process of becoming an official Ubuntu team is? Jun 28 21:25:02 <jenda> explaing what? Jun 28 21:25:05 <jenda> ah Jun 28 21:25:15 <jenda> matthewrevell: no i can't, haven't studied it. Jun 28 21:25:25 <jenda> Oh yes Jun 28 21:25:32 <jenda> thanks coopster, wouldda forgat Jun 28 21:25:32 <matthewrevell> jenda: AFAIK you have to show quite a lot before even applying. Jun 28 21:25:40 <ompaul> matthewrevell, it appears you do a job of work, you hand your needs to the CC and it goes forward from there Jun 28 21:25:42 <jenda> matthewrevell: I don't plan to apply any time soon Jun 28 21:25:46 <matthewrevell> ompaul: Cool. Jun 28 21:25:48 <nixternal> are we not an official ubuntu team? we have LP, wiki, and members with Ubuntu support... ;) Jun 28 21:26:04 <matthewrevell> jenda: No, I tihnk we need to really prove what we can do first. Jun 28 21:26:10 <jenda> Let's not discuss that please - it's not important for the work we do. Jun 28 21:26:17 <jenda> matthewrevell: yes Jun 28 21:26:17 <matthewrevell> jenda: No? Jun 28 21:26:27 <jenda> We do what we can Jun 28 21:26:28 <bimberi> nixternal: i guess improving, formalising communication is part of that process Jun 28 21:26:29 <ompaul> jenda, there are several ubuntu members in the MT - getting it rubber stamped would not be too hard Jun 28 21:26:41 <jenda> ompaul: once there is some results Jun 28 21:26:54 <jenda> coopster reminded me of an important point. Jun 28 21:27:04 <dotwaffle> Let's find out what we're doing before we get ahead of ourselves :) Jun 28 21:27:08 <jenda> Does everyone agree with member-list pruning? Jun 28 21:27:11 <ompaul> jenda, we have a need, there is a mission, we have goals, and you can't have a distro team after you do the first release Jun 28 21:27:11 <nixternal> +1 dotwaffle Jun 28 21:27:13 <ompaul> :-) Jun 28 21:27:13 <mindspin> yup the membersilt thing Jun 28 21:27:15 <matthewrevell> dotwaffle: It's good to know what we're aiming for :) Jun 28 21:27:19 <coopster> ompaul: i would think, results or no, having official team status is a plus, and we should do that provided it doesnt distract us from doing the things that make the results Jun 28 21:27:32 <_sara> yeah for the member list pruning Jun 28 21:27:38 <matthewrevell> coopster: we won't get official status without results. Anyway, let's move on :) Jun 28 21:27:41 <coopster> k Jun 28 21:27:42 <nixternal> @schedule chicago Jun 28 21:27:43 <Ubugtu> Schedule for America/Chicago: Current meeting: Marketing Team | 29 Jun 09:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 04 Jul 15:00: Technical Board | 05 Jul 15:00: Edubuntu | 06 Jul 15:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 12 Jul 07:00: Edubuntu Jun 28 21:27:44 <jenda> And does everyone agree with removing the wiki member list? Jun 28 21:27:50 <dotwaffle> what are the issues with the memberlist at the moment? Dud members? Jun 28 21:27:53 <matthewrevell> jenda: Yes Jun 28 21:27:56 <jenda> I'll contact all the people on it and ask them to join LP Jun 28 21:28:04 <bimberi> jenda: yes, go with Launchpad Jun 28 21:28:07 <jenda> dotwaffle: 70 of them Jun 28 21:28:16 <dotwaffle> jenda: I see. Ok. Jun 28 21:28:18 <jenda> OK, any objections? Jun 28 21:28:19 <mindspin> yup launchpad Jun 28 21:28:26 <matthewrevell> jenda: no Jun 28 21:28:34 * jenda is waiting for a yes ;) Jun 28 21:28:37 <jenda> OK Jun 28 21:28:40 <nixternal> whoa Jun 28 21:28:40 <jenda> settled. >> However, decisions themselves should be taken in meetings in real time. > > That seems to work well for other teams but we need to be inclusive, > and I'm certain you agree with that. > > The problem is that, unless we give everyone ample time to put their > view forward, we don't appear to be inclusive. There may times that we > reach agreement and make a decision on the list. We can then just > rubber-stamp it at a meeting. > > Like I say, this is just the growing pains of new people working > together. I don't see there being any major problems. > Agreed on all accounts. -- ubuntu-marketing mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
