Jordan Mantha wrote: > Is there an inherent reason why we can't just use a temporary "lock" > solution like we did in Dapper where when you want to do a merge you > filed a bug and closed it when you were done? If we tagged the bugs with > "[Feisty merge]" it would be fairly easy to see what's going on. Then > when people go to do a merge/sync the first thing they could look for is > an existing bug. Is that too much bug traffic? It seems to me the issue > is not so much "ownership" as duplication of effort (we don't want 2 > people merging/uploading the same thing) so putting a temporary lock on > a merge while you are working on it is really what we are looking for. > > -Jordan
I think that a significantly better idea would be to have a temporary locking feature in MoM itself, so you can see immediately whether it has been taken or not. A comment field would be nice too, for noting that a merge cannot be done for such-and-such reason. William. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
