William Grant wrote: > Jordan Mantha wrote: > >> Is there an inherent reason why we can't just use a temporary "lock" >> solution like we did in Dapper where when you want to do a merge you >> filed a bug and closed it when you were done? If we tagged the bugs with >> "[Feisty merge]" it would be fairly easy to see what's going on. Then >> when people go to do a merge/sync the first thing they could look for is >> an existing bug. Is that too much bug traffic? It seems to me the issue >> is not so much "ownership" as duplication of effort (we don't want 2 >> people merging/uploading the same thing) so putting a temporary lock on >> a merge while you are working on it is really what we are looking for. >> >> -Jordan >> > > I think that a significantly better idea would be to have a temporary > locking feature in MoM itself, so you can see immediately whether it has > been taken or not. A comment field would be nice too, for noting that a > merge cannot be done for such-and-such reason. > > William. > > Yeah, for me the ideal solution would be to have a checkbox and comment field for each line. You check the box if you are working on the sync/merge and in the comment field you could put your name and for Hopefuls a link to the LP bug # that needed sponsoring.
-Jordan -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
