Daniel T. Chen a écrit : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ouattara Oumar Aziz wrote: >> I believe you didn't get my problem. > > No, I believe you didn't understand my response. :) > > 1) There's no "libmux" string in that diff.gz _at all_. No string, no > reference, no possible way of stating that libmux is associated with > libvlc0-dev from the Debian packaging that Ubuntu inherits. > > 2) In 7.04: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-file search libmux > vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_asf_plugin.so > vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_avi_plugin.so > vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_dummy_plugin.so > vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_mp4_plugin.so > vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_mpjpeg_plugin.so > vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_ogg_plugin.so > vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_ps_plugin.so > vlc-nox: usr/lib/vlc/mux/libmux_wav_plugin.so > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-file search libmux_ts > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ > > In other words, I'm not sure where you're pulling the information for > libmux_ts.a, but it's surely not from 7.04's repositories. And since we > only actively develop 7.04, the previous releases are not relevant here. > >> - why is my system saying that that *libmux* file exists in a package >> when it doesn't ? I believe apt-file can't just imagine that. Since it >> told me that the file were in libvlc0-dev, it may be written somewhere. > > Check your sources.list(5), perhaps? [Again, all repos not hosted by > Ubuntu mirrors _and_ not 7.04 are irrelevant.] > >> - I know that lib can be found on vlc website. So it's not impossible >> that the package could contain them if we choose to. > > So please file a wishlist bug using Launchpad to include said file. > >> On an other hand, there is also a lib *libfaad.a* that has the same >> problem, but libfaad.a can be found in libfaad2-dev package. So was the >> choice of removing all the *.a files from lbvlc0-dev to prevent some >> conflict ? > > Again, Ubuntu inherits the Debian packaging. Your question regarding > original intent is better posed in that forum. > >> if so, any of the *.a files should be provide in some other packages and >> the problem of that description stuff should be fixed. > > There is _no_ "description stuff" in the official 7.04 libvlc0-dev > package that refers to any "libmux". > > Thanks,
OK, Thanks. I guess I should file a bug in launchpad since I am on Edgy (6.10). I thought I should refer to you when seeing the the maintainer was Ubuntu-MOTU. Thanks a lot for your help :) . wattazoum -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
