On Friday 03 August 2007 02:15, Emmet Hikory wrote: > On 8/3/07, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On revu, this is all done by dput revu ..... > > Well, no. #1 & #2 are currently done in LP, with the current > process. #3 is currently `dput revu ...`, whereas I'm suggesting > `dput ppa ...`, which doesn't seem that different. OK. Is was not quite correct, but adding the LP business is a recent change and a mistake in my opinion. If there's a needs-packaging bug, the packager can assign it to themselves, but that's all that really needs doing in LP. LP is stunningly slow as web pages go. I find it extremely frustrating. I'm learning the mail interface, but as a web based service I find it almost unusable. Pushing more towards LP is just going to make reviewing harder and take longer. I am convinced. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
