Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> bzr switch can switch between lightweight working trees. Fixing that
>> for heavyweight checkouts would be relatively easy; and pull
>> --overwrite is essentially the same thing for branches anyhow.
>
> These both still require that separate working trees lie around on the
> disk for each branch somewhere, right? It doesn't seem like bzr is
> capable of keeping track of all branch information in a single .bzr
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> directory like git does with its .git directory. That's a big lose
> for this particular situation, in my opinion.
By "all branch information", I meant "information about all branches,
not just this one".
--
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 |
http://mwolson.org/ -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net | /` |\ | | |
Sysadmin -- Hobbies: Lisp, GP2X, HCoop | |_] | \| |_|
Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner |
pgpP8i9N83pgf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
