Stephan Hermann wrote: > Good Morning, > > I don't see any intervention of the motu-council here. > You are talking about two different upstream projects, > <snip> > And I think this is your problem right now. Not a technical or motu > problem... > > Regards, > > \sh > The reason why I ask for the council to take a position is not technical; it's about the way the thing has been handled. I have a good name, I post a package, he has a good name, he doesn't post a package; I offer to fix things and to see if we can meet in the middle, he takes the good name and *orders* me to change a quite gigantic work and undertake another gigantic work so in future my work won't clash with his. *This* is where I raise a question about CoC.
The technical question can be discussed in motu and/or devel list. And no, it's not *mine* problem (or did you mean your=the both of you; in that case, no, it's not *our* problem). It will be Ubuntu users problem when all the other distros will have a /usr/bin/falcon running scripts (as they are having right now an open project request) while Ubuntu will have a /usr/bin/falcon managing packages. That's the only reason I am still here trying to sort out the technical aspect; for respect towards Ubuntu users. In fact, my first reaction was just that of requesting my package to be de-listed, but I understood this would cause quite a mess, which I prefer to avoid through some sort of negotiate. Regards, Giancarlo. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
