On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:15:41PM +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: > I don't have a strong opinion about which is the right falcon, but > such a Conflicts: would be wrong. Section 10.1 of the Debian Policy > Manual (1) clearly states, in part:
I think this process makes sense. IMO, the programming language should allowed to be /usr/bin/falcon. Changing the name of the interpreter will mean that any program that is supposed to be interpreted by falcon will need to be patched. OTOH, renaming the binary in Dennis' repository management thing has very limited consequences. -- Soren Hansen Ubuntu Server Team http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
