-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Emmet Hikory wrote: > On Jan 19, 2008 4:35 AM, Giancarlo Niccolai wrote: >> What I am going to do, and for what I ask for confirmation: >> - ------------------------------------------------------------ >> I am going to repack as "falconpl", set conflict with the "falcon" >> package and re-upload in REVU. In the meanwhile I have (hopefully) >> cleaned the stoppers that was listed in the REVU record by persia. >> - ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Please send to the list or to me an OK or a stopper. > > Please rather: > > Repack both source and binary packages as "falconpl" (I believe binary > is already complete). Yes, sorry, I meant falconpl for both the source and the binary packages. The issues from the previous reviews are (hopefully) cleared. "Hopefully" meaning that I did my best to clear them and I think I succeed.
> Do not set Conflict: with falcon (this is an incorrect usage of this header) > Clean other packaging issues from previous reviews. Ah, ok, I probably misunderstood the latest intervention. >> Other than this, I would like MOTUs to consider the binary clash >> problem. Sooner or later the /usr/bin/falcon name will have to be dealt, >> and it would be better if we deal about it now. > > I believe that the current proposal under consideration (and not > yet refuted) is that proposed by Soren Hansen (1). As such, the > binary conflict would be considered a bug in the falcon package, > rather than the falconpl package (unless there is still active > dispute, in which case someone should correct me). In any case, > sometime before the hardy release, one of the usages of > /usr/bin/falcon will be renamed. As this conflict has now been raised > and is under discussion, it should neither block review of other > aspects of the falconpl package, nor block inclusion if all other > conditions are met. I thank you very much for having clarified the point. I will proceed as you indicate immediately. In the meanwhile, I post a package with source release 0.8.7 (current development branch). The current status of source is ready or nearly ready for a new release, that we (developers at Falcon pl) are issuing by the end of January. We're just bug-fixing the previous release to provide the best package we can. Giancarlo Niccolai. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHkRsL5nwsoBIDC4YRArA0AJ9XKRuOWJ7YPbTQLk41j0vo7XlVjgCcCxFR ExJWKnMbqo1G0mPocXpb2aE= =FXFc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
