Moins, On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:28:30 +0200 Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Daniel Holbach writes: > >> > 2) requirement for the person who packaged the new software to > >> > become bug contact > > Cesare Tirabassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I thought that was the norm ... > > I agree that this is a very good idea, but I don't rememer if or when > we did make that a requirement. It's not...because there is no automatism for this. Regarding LP, we could honour XSBC-Original-Maintainer from debian control, because NEW packages for universe should be: Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU XSBC-Original-Maintainer: <the packager> With this, we could automatically push <the packager> as bug contact. Additionally we could have a Origin header or something similar where we can filter for in LP. Well, regarding the non-direct-maintainership in Ubuntu, i don't think there is really a sane way of achieving those goals, or we move from team maintaining to single package maintainer methods, for packages uploaded to Ubuntu and not coming from debian.. which then brings us to another problem... Bah, \sh -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
