Stephan Hermann wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:52:45 +0200 > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyway, should I see a package for which the packager says he won't >> look at it anymore when it hits the archive because it's not his >> duty, I won't upload it. With those arguments, it's not his duty to >> package it and get it into the archive either way, so why should he >> be allowed to do one but not the other if he doesn't care for the >> package? > > Well, you don't know the guy who wants to get his package uploaded to > the archive..
I may know him :) > so after the package hit the archive, the whole MOTU team > is responsible to "support" the package anyways...just because "the > former guy who proposed the package doesn't want to maintain it > anymore" is no reason to drop the package from the archive... Right. I meant if the packager said it beforehand. But I agree with you that if he doesn't say anything and I upload it, you're right he disappearing wouldn't be a (good enough) reason to remove the package. This makes me (sadly?) want to concentrate on packages for which I know the packager will keep the interest on them. Cheers, Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu