On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 18:48 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 18/06/08 at 10:12 -0500, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote: > > Thanks for the examples, now i'm clearer on what you meant. > > > > I also think this will we great, but to have a wiki page for every > > package and to edit it with every change it's not the best to do IMHO. > > On the other hand we can open a bug for the changes and explain > > everything there and just include the (LP: #XXXXX) part to it. > > I didn't mean that there should be one wiki page per package. Only that > there should be one wiki page (or one section on the same wiki page) for > each class of change. In the case of libext-dev, there was probably at > least 20 packages affected by that change, where the exact same patch > (add libext-dev to build-deps) was needed.
Well, i still prefer to open a bug report instead of using a wiki page, it's easier and better for comments/discussion. I have open a wiki page [1] with some points about this conversation. 1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GoodPractices -- aka nxvl Key fingerprint = BCE4 27A0 D03E 55DE DA2D BE06 891D 8DEE 6545 97FE gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 654597FE
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
