-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nick Ellery schrieb: > On the four points made by Daniel, I can agree with all but the fourth > being beneficial. The reason that different Membership Boards were > created was to allow those that are unable to attend CC meetings to > still apply for membership. Doing something like this isn't quite as > reasonable with developer applications, and as such it may become very > difficult for people to make it to the meetings. I am in this position. > > Perhaps what could work is that the process is kept to email. > Everything which Daniel suggested can be done here, with links to wiki > pages (where sponsorship feedback could be left) etc. From there, the > meetings can take place, and the MC can decide whether or not to accept > an application there, meaning that the developer who is applying does > not have to be there, but of course could be.
As I said in another mail already: we can be flexible. If the time can't be met, we can try organising a different time. If that does not work at all, we can still stick to email (or whatever). I think there's a lot of benefit to having public meetings and face-to-face time with the applicant. Have a great day, Daniel - -- My 5 today: #315769 (last-align), #315535 (ubuntu), #315881 (nautilus- sendto), #309684 (exiv2), #316026 (imlib2) Do 5 a day - every day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/5-A-Day -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklrF2oACgkQRjrlnQWd1etNIwCdGLMW1QwzVxxb6RtHeRIwl+O3 JosAoIBRmRb/3xG4D3W5ukAfnjxIB5Xy =R5VN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
