Am 28.09.2013 um 03:51 schrieb Matthew Fischer <[email protected]>:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Ted Gould <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 17:37 -0400, Scott Sweeny wrote: > Why wouldn't you just statically link them? Seems like roughly the same for > most applications that have a single binary. > > Ted > > > In this specific instance we ended up in a black hole of static linking, I > had about 4-5 libs specified before I found some for which we don't ship > static stuff. Neither Scott nor I could figure out how to make Qt allow us to > statically link some thing and dynamically link others. That would have also > solved this specific issue. Is that possible? Statically linking a library usually just involves *building* that specific library as a static one and then link as usual. Can you elaborate a bit more on your problem? How is Qt involved in the linking step? Regards, Fabian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
