On Monday 30 September 2013 09:34:02 David Barth wrote: > Le 30/09/2013 09:26, Michael Zanetti a écrit : > >> Additionally, some libraries in Ubuntu apparently don't ship static > >> files in their -dev packages. Once again, we could build those > >> statically by hand and include them but that's the kind of thing I was > >> hoping to avoid as an outcome of this discussion. > > > > As "not having to worry about dependencies" is the whole point of click > > packages I'm afraid that won't be the outcome of the discussion. > > I think Scott was thinking about /build dependencies/, not runtime ones. > > Having pre-built static libraries avaiable in -dev packages would > simplify the development of applications using libraries absent from the > SDK, but still part of the Ubuntu archive (main, universe, etc.).
Yep, shipping static libs with -dev packages would probably be the cleanest way to deal with this. Probably not for all packages, but at least for the some (most I guess). Br, Michael -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
