Hi all,

I've been taking care of a backlog of packages that have been removed in
Debian but not removed in Ubuntu.  One of the packages that's shown up on
the list as having reverse-dependencies in Ubuntu is obexd, whose packages
(obexd-client and obexd-server) don't merely have reverse-dependencies, they
have the ubuntu-touch metapackage as a reverse-dependency.

According to the Debian bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/772094), these
packages are obsolete and superseded by bluez-obexd.  bluez-obexd is
available in Ubuntu, and does show itself as replacing obexd-client and
obexd-server.  Should the touch seed be changed to use bluez-obexd in place
of obexd-{client,server} going forward from wily?  Do we have test cases for
obex support on the phone?

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
[email protected]                                     [email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to